GDGSX : Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S

GDGSX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with HIGH fees.

GDGSX

Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S

FI Score

22 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GDGSX vs AKFAX

15% FI Score
  • akfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Aberdeen Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs ADMQX

15% FI Score
  • admqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

361 Domestic Long/Short Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs ARECX

15% FI Score
  • arecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

AB Global Real Estate Investment Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs ATMCX

15% FI Score
  • atmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Strategic Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs ATPCX

15% FI Score
  • atpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Aquila Three Peaks High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs PCYIX

15% FI Score
  • pcyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

PCS Commodity Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs MFMLX

15% FI Score
  • mfmlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Frontier Markets Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 2.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs TUIFX

15% FI Score
  • tuifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Toews Unconstrained Income Fund

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs PRTBX

15% FI Score
  • prtbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs PGLOX

15% FI Score
  • pglox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

T. Rowe Price Global Consumer Fund

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs CIPDX

15% FI Score
  • cipdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Champlain Emerging Markets Fund Advisor Shares

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs UHPIX

14% FI Score
  • uhpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort China Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs VPC

14% FI Score
  • vpc
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Virtus Private Credit ETF

Expenses: 8.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs WAVIX

14% FI Score
  • wavix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Longboard Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 2.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs WCPIX

14% FI Score
  • wcpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Communication Services UltraSector ProFund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs XVZ

14% FI Score
  • xvz
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Volatility

iPath S&P 500 Dynamic VIX ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs BOGSX

14% FI Score
  • bogsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs LQNIX

14% FI Score
  • lqnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

QS Global Market Neutral Fund Class I

Expenses: 3.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs PXRAX

14% FI Score
  • pxrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Virtus Duff & Phelps International Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs HANAX

14% FI Score
  • hanax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hanlon Managed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo