GDGSX : Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S

GDGSX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with HIGH fees.

GDGSX

Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S

FI Score

22 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GDGSX vs RYHIX

15% FI Score
  • ryhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Rydex Health Care Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs ICBAX

15% FI Score
  • icbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

ICON Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs ICFSX

15% FI Score
  • icfsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

ICON Financial Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs FTIIX

15% FI Score
  • ftiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Federated Global Total Return Bond Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs TPHAX

15% FI Score
  • tphax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs PCAFX

15% FI Score
  • pcafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Prospector Capital Appreciation Fund

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs ISCCX

15% FI Score
  • isccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Federated International Small-Mid Company Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs GIJCX

15% FI Score
  • gijcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Guggenheim Municipal Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs PDRFX

15% FI Score
  • pdrfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Risk Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs SZK

15% FI Score
  • szk
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs JMNAX

15% FI Score
  • jmnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

JPMorgan Research Market Neutral Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs NFICX

15% FI Score
  • nficx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs NGLCX

15% FI Score
  • nglcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Neuberger Berman Global Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs GUMCX

15% FI Score
  • gumcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Guggenheim Market Neutral Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs MSULX

15% FI Score
  • msulx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs HLFNX

15% FI Score
  • hlfnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs UJPIX

15% FI Score
  • ujpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraJapan Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs MCLTX

15% FI Score
  • mcltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Latin America Stock

BlackRock Latin America Fund, Inc. Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Latin America Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs CNZLX

15% FI Score
  • cnzlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

Commonwealth Australia/New Zealand Fund

Expenses: 2.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs ACVKX

15% FI Score
  • acvkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AC Alternatives® Market Neutral Value Fund I Class

Expenses: 3.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo