GDGSX : Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S

GDGSX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with HIGH fees.

GDGSX

Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S

FI Score

22 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GDGSX vs AFMMX

22% FI Score
  • afmmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Yorktown Short Term Bond Fund Class L

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs PLBBX

22% FI Score
  • plbbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Plumb Balanced Fund

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs NWJTX

22% FI Score
  • nwjtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nationwide Loomis Short Term Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs RDMIX

22% FI Score
  • rdmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Rational/ReSolve Adaptive Asset Allocation Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs MALTX

22% FI Score
  • maltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Latin America Stock

BlackRock Latin America Fund, Inc. Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Latin America Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs ORILX

22% FI Score
  • orilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

North Square Multi Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs GURPX

22% FI Score
  • gurpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs OKMUX

22% FI Score
  • okmux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Oklahoma Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs JTQAX

22% FI Score
  • jtqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

John Hancock ESG International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs UAG

22% FI Score
  • uag
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

UBS ETRACS CMCI Agriculture Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs GOPAX

22% FI Score
  • gopax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Aberdeen China A Share Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs JPHF

22% FI Score
  • jphf
  • ETF
  • Other
  • Multialternative

JPMorgan Diversified Alternative ETF

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Multialternative Other fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs FVALX

22% FI Score
  • fvalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Forester Value Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs FPPAX

22% FI Score
  • fppax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Prudent Investor Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs FTRCX

22% FI Score
  • ftrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2035 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs AFLEX

22% FI Score
  • aflex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs CPATX

22% FI Score
  • cpatx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Counterpoint Tactical Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs FRFCX

22% FI Score
  • frfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs HCMEX

22% FI Score
  • hcmex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

HCM Income Plus Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs AFJCX

22% FI Score
  • afjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

AllianzGI International Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo