GDGSX : Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S

GDGSX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with HIGH fees.

GDGSX

Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S

FI Score

22 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GDGSX vs AFJCX

22% FI Score
  • afjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

AllianzGI International Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs LVLAX

22% FI Score
  • lvlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco Low Volatility Emerging Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs NFIAX

22% FI Score
  • nfiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs LZSMX

22% FI Score
  • lzsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs FAUS

22% FI Score
  • faus
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

First Trust Australia AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs LOUP

22% FI Score
  • loup
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Innovator Loup Frontier Tech ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs EWECX

22% FI Score
  • ewecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs UAG

22% FI Score
  • uag
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

UBS ETRACS CMCI Agriculture Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs BLSCX

22% FI Score
  • blscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

BlackRock Advantage Emerging Markets Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs NCIGX

22% FI Score
  • ncigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Nuveen NWQ International Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs ESHAX

22% FI Score
  • eshax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs EQCHX

22% FI Score
  • eqchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs ECHSX

22% FI Score
  • echsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs DPFAX

22% FI Score
  • dpfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs FTTCX

22% FI Score
  • fttcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2025 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs PFUEX

22% FI Score
  • pfuex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Principal Finisterre Unconstrained Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs APRIX

22% FI Score
  • aprix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

AAM/Phocas Real Estate Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs GLNAX

22% FI Score
  • glnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs SUHAX

22% FI Score
  • suhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

DWS Health and Wellness Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs DNCGX

22% FI Score
  • dncgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Dunham Corporate/Government Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo