GDGSX : Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S

GDGSX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with HIGH fees.

GDGSX

Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S

FI Score

22 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GDGSX vs EPVIX

22% FI Score
  • epvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

EuroPac International Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs EPGFX

22% FI Score
  • epgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

EuroPac Gold Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs SREZX

22% FI Score
  • srezx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

PGIM Select Real Estate Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs MEXX

22% FI Score
  • mexx
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily MSCI Mexico Bull 3X Shares Direxion Daily MSCI Mexico Bull 3

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs EHGAX

22% FI Score
  • ehgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Hexavest Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs IREAX

22% FI Score
  • ireax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Ivy LaSalle Global Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs CVLCX

22% FI Score
  • cvlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Growth & Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs CVISX

22% FI Score
  • cvisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Causeway International Small Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs CROC

22% FI Score
  • croc
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Australian Dollar

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs CRECX

22% FI Score
  • crecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs PIMEX

22% FI Score
  • pimex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Putnam Intermediate-Term Municipal Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs QABGX

22% FI Score
  • qabgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Federated MDT Balanced Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs OEMAX

22% FI Score
  • oemax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs CIGCX

22% FI Score
  • cigcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Calamos International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs NAFOX

22% FI Score
  • nafox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Oregon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs PHSCX

22% FI Score
  • phscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO High Yield Spectrum Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs PRCPX

22% FI Score
  • prcpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund, Inc.

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs CGAVX

22% FI Score
  • cgavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Causeway Global Absolute Return Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs RSIFX

22% FI Score
  • rsifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Victory RS Science and Technology Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GDGSX vs UAG

22% FI Score
  • uag
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

UBS ETRACS CMCI Agriculture Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo