ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs ABAEX

32% FI Score
  • abaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ABYCX

32% FI Score
  • abycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AGLOX

32% FI Score
  • aglox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Ariel Global Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AIWCX

32% FI Score
  • aiwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Century International Growth Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ADOAX

32% FI Score
  • adoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

ACM Dynamic Opportunity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ADOCX

32% FI Score
  • adocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Alger Dynamic Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ANYCX

32% FI Score
  • anycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund New York Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs APINX

32% FI Score
  • apinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

AMG Managers Pictet International Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs APPLX

32% FI Score
  • applx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Appleseed Fund Investor Share

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AREEX

32% FI Score
  • areex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

American Century Real Estate Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARFMX

32% FI Score
  • arfmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARNCX

32% FI Score
  • arncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2020 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ASNAX

32% FI Score
  • asnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ATTCX

32% FI Score
  • attcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice In Retirement Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AWPAX

32% FI Score
  • awpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BACAX

32% FI Score
  • bacax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund Investor A Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BACSX

32% FI Score
  • bacsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BAEMX

32% FI Score
  • baemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

BMO LGM Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LSGGX

32% FI Score
  • lsggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PBRCX

32% FI Score
  • pbrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Federated Prudent Bear Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 3.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo