ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs BGLBX

32% FI Score
  • bglbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BMO Global Low Volatility Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BGRSX

32% FI Score
  • bgrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Boston Partners Global Long/Short Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BIFIX

32% FI Score
  • bifix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

William Blair Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BNIEX

32% FI Score
  • bniex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PEBCX

32% FI Score
  • pebcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BUG

32% FI Score
  • bug
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Global X Cybersecurity ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CHII

32% FI Score
  • chii
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Industrials ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PQIZX

32% FI Score
  • pqizx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PSRZX

32% FI Score
  • psrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CIGRX

32% FI Score
  • cigrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Calamos International Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CPUAX

32% FI Score
  • cpuax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AAM/Insight Select Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RETL

32% FI Score
  • retl
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ROGSX

32% FI Score
  • rogsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Red Oak Technology Select Fund

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RRGAX

32% FI Score
  • rrgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GEADX

32% FI Score
  • geadx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Goldman Sachs Enhanced Income Fund Class Administration

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs DLUSX

32% FI Score
  • dlusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

DoubleLine Ultra Short Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TTSMX

32% FI Score
  • ttsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Dupree Mutual Fund Tennessee Tax-Free Short-To-Medium Fund

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SMASX

32% FI Score
  • smasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs STMDX

32% FI Score
  • stmdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SUICX

32% FI Score
  • suicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

DWS CROCI International Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo