ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs UGAZ

32% FI Score
  • ugaz
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

VelocityShares 3x Long Natural Gas ETN Linked to the S&P GSCI Natural Gas Index ER

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs WIBAX

32% FI Score
  • wibax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Wilmington Intermediate-Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JFIAX

32% FI Score
  • jfiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

John Hancock Funds Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JOSMX

32% FI Score
  • josmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

JOHCM International Small Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NAVAX

32% FI Score
  • navax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Navigator Equity Hedged Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JJE

32% FI Score
  • jje
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Energy Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TGWIX

32% FI Score
  • tgwix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

TCW Emerging Markets Local Currency Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TMUIX

32% FI Score
  • tmuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Transamerica Global Equity Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GXSCX

32% FI Score
  • gxscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Goldman Sachs Satellite Strategies Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NGLAX

32% FI Score
  • nglax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Neuberger Berman Global Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NHICX

32% FI Score
  • nhicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NSCIX

32% FI Score
  • nscix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia South Carolina Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JPVIX

32% FI Score
  • jpvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Janus Henderson Value Plus Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ORTCX

32% FI Score
  • ortcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aquila Tax-Free Trust of Oregon Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs USTCX

32% FI Score
  • ustcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

USAA Science & Technology Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PADCX

32% FI Score
  • padcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MSEPX

32% FI Score
  • msepx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 2.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MCCGX

32% FI Score
  • mccgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Mirae Asset Emerging Markets Great Consumer Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AABFX

32% FI Score
  • aabfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AAHMX

32% FI Score
  • aahmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aberdeen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo