ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs JPHAX

35% FI Score
  • jphax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FSAIX

35% FI Score
  • fsaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

Fidelity® Select Portfolios Air Transportation Portfolio

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SEEFX

35% FI Score
  • seefx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JVGTX

35% FI Score
  • jvgtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Adaptive Global Allocation Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FSMIX

35% FI Score
  • fsmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Franklin Strategic Mortgage Fund Class A1

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs WFEAX

35% FI Score
  • wfeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Wells Fargo International Equity Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SEMOX

35% FI Score
  • semox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Semper MBS Total Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NQGAX

35% FI Score
  • nqgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen NWQ Global Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs KTCAX

35% FI Score
  • ktcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

DWS Science and Technology Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MTCAX

35% FI Score
  • mtcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

MFS Technology Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IOBZX

35% FI Score
  • iobzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ICON Flexible Bond Fund Class S

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SSAIX

35% FI Score
  • ssaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

State Street International Stock Selection Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GMOM

35% FI Score
  • gmom
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Cambria Global Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs DBLIX

35% FI Score
  • dblix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DoubleLine Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PHSTX

35% FI Score
  • phstx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Putnam Global Health Care Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TBCUX

35% FI Score
  • tbcux
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Tweedy, Browne Global Value Fund II - Currency Unhedged

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MYY

35% FI Score
  • myy
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short MidCap400

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GSAGX

35% FI Score
  • gsagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NFRAX

35% FI Score
  • nfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Symphony Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EVGBX

34% FI Score
  • evgbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Evermore Global Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo