ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs PTHYX

35% FI Score
  • pthyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs DLEUX

35% FI Score
  • dleux
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

DoubleLine Shiller Enhanced International CAPE® Class N

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MCILX

35% FI Score
  • mcilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

BlackRock International Fund of BlackRock Series, Inc.Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GTHIX

35% FI Score
  • gthix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Invesco Health Care Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EABSX

35% FI Score
  • eabsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Parametric TABS Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HERAX

35% FI Score
  • herax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Hartford Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NMMGX

35% FI Score
  • nmmgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Northern Multi-Manager Global Real Estate Fund

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MNBAX

35% FI Score
  • mnbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series Class S

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ERSX

35% FI Score
  • ersx
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

ERShares Non-US Small Cap Fund

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CEMDX

35% FI Score
  • cemdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PNNCX

35% FI Score
  • pnncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Putnam New York Tax Exempt Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MQLCX

35% FI Score
  • mqlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS Limited Maturity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MSCKX

35% FI Score
  • msckx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MCYHX

35% FI Score
  • mcyhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BlackRock High Yield Municipal Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PST

35% FI Score
  • pst
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FEDDX

35% FI Score
  • feddx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Fidelity® Emerging Markets Discovery Fund

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FEGOX

35% FI Score
  • fegox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

First Eagle Gold Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs REK

35% FI Score
  • rek
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short Real Estate

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MSDLX

35% FI Score
  • msdlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MWCBX

35% FI Score
  • mwcbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Corporate Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo