WTABX : Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund Class A

WTABX is a Bond Market Municipal Bond with MODERATE fees.

WTABX

Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund Class A

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare WTABX vs VRECX

18% FI Score
  • vrecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class CX

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs THBVX

18% FI Score
  • thbvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

THB Asset Management MicroCap Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs TNACX

18% FI Score
  • tnacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs RMICX

18% FI Score
  • rmicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

RiverFront Asset Allocation Moderate Class C

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs SOPIX

18% FI Score
  • sopix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds Short NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs BUYIX

17% FI Score
  • buyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Catalyst Buyback Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs WFODX

17% FI Score
  • wfodx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target Today Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs RYFSX

17% FI Score
  • ryfsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Royce Global Financial Services Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs RYCAX

17% FI Score
  • rycax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

Rydex Consumer Products Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs RYPDX

17% FI Score
  • rypdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

Rydex Consumer Products Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs WWWEX

17% FI Score
  • wwwex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Kinetics Global No Load Class

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs RXD

17% FI Score
  • rxd
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Health Care

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs TPYCX

17% FI Score
  • tpycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Touchstone International ESG Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs UBPIX

17% FI Score
  • ubpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs SHPIX

17% FI Score
  • shpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds Short Small Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs WFBCX

17% FI Score
  • wfbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs RNCOX

17% FI Score
  • rncox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

RiverNorth Core Opportunity Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs TVVAX

17% FI Score
  • tvvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs SBQIX

17% FI Score
  • sbqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

AmericaFirst Large Cap Share Buyback Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs TVVFX

17% FI Score
  • tvvfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Value Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo