Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$TRXIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- vicax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- vicex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Investor Class Shares
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- psp
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lpefx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- iaopx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mevox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Managed Equity Volatility Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hrlcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
The Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- imnax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Transamerica Global Equity Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- piptx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »