RLTCX : RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class C

RLTCX is a Allocation Market Total World with HIGH fees.

RLTCX

RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class C

FI Score

20 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Similar Funds

We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RLTCX vs CGAEX

28% FI Score
  • cgaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs IZSAX

28% FI Score
  • izsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Select Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs PGMCX

28% FI Score
  • pgmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs MCEGX

28% FI Score
  • mcegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BlackRock Long-Horizon Equity Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs CVLOX

28% FI Score
  • cvlox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Growth & Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs CGVVX

28% FI Score
  • cgvvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Causeway Global Value Fund Investor

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs BGVIX

27% FI Score
  • bgvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Brandes Global Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs IAOPX

27% FI Score
  • iaopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs MEVOX

27% FI Score
  • mevox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Managed Equity Volatility Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs CENNX

27% FI Score
  • cennx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Centerstone Investors Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs PSP

27% FI Score
  • psp
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs VICEX

27% FI Score
  • vicex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs VICAX

27% FI Score
  • vicax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs WAGOX

27% FI Score
  • wagox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund® Investor Class

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs LSAGX

27% FI Score
  • lsagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs LPEFX

27% FI Score
  • lpefx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs PQICX

26% FI Score
  • pqicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs HRLCX

26% FI Score
  • hrlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

The Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs IMNAX

26% FI Score
  • imnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Transamerica Global Equity Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLTCX vs MLNIX

26% FI Score
  • mlnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo