RLSFX : RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund Retail Class

RLSFX is a Alternatives Market Short with HIGH fees.

RLSFX

RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund Retail Class

FI Score

38 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,006 Alternatives Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RLSFX vs BFRAX

44% FI Score
  • bfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Portfolio Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TGPCX

44% FI Score
  • tgpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

TCW Conservative Allocation Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs PRJCX

44% FI Score
  • prjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund-Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs FFA

44% FI Score
  • ffa
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Options-based

First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs VANTX

44% FI Score
  • vantx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

JPMorgan New York Tax Free Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs ARSIX

44% FI Score
  • arsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs PQIRX

44% FI Score
  • pqirx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Pioneer Equity Income Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TWM

44% FI Score
  • twm
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Russell2000

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs KGGAX

44% FI Score
  • kggax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs SVACX

44% FI Score
  • svacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Federated Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs BSGLX

44% FI Score
  • bsglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs SUBYX

44% FI Score
  • subyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs ETO

44% FI Score
  • eto
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs TBAAX

44% FI Score
  • tbaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Touchstone Dynamic Diversified Income Fund A

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs OGIG

44% FI Score
  • ogig
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs SHYAX

44% FI Score
  • shyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

SEI Institutional Managed Trust High Yield Bond Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs CWFIX

44% FI Score
  • cwfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs ESIIX

44% FI Score
  • esiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs HMVTX

44% FI Score
  • hmvtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RLSFX vs FWFIX

44% FI Score
  • fwfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

First Western Fixed Income Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo