RHS : Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF

RHS is a Sector Equity Market Consumer Defensive with MODERATE fees.

RHS

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF

FI Score

63 /100

Diversification Rating

9 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Consumer Defensive funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RHS vs CNPIX

  • cnpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Consumer Goods Ultra Sector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs RYWCX

  • rywcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs RYHRX

  • ryhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Rydex Real Estate Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs PGCBX

  • pgcbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Global Multisector Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs LFVFX

  • lfvfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Leader High Quality Low Duration Bond Fund InvestorShares

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs PASMX

  • pasmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Pacific Advisors Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 5.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs LACK

  • lack
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily Cnsmr Staples Bear 3XShrs

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs LCMCX

  • lcmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Leader Capital Leader Short Duration Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs PGISX

  • pgisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Pacific Advisors Small Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 5.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs PGSCX

  • pgscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Pacific Advisors Fund Inc. - Small Cap Value Fund

Expenses: 6.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs RYMMX

  • rymmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs RYWBX

  • rywbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Weakening Dollar 2x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs PRVHX

  • prvhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs UVPSX

  • uvpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort Emerging Market Fund Service Class

Expenses: 2.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs VGECX

  • vgecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Virtus Vontobel Greater European Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs ACXAX

  • acxax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Catalyst Multi-Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs HNRCX

  • hnrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Highland Opportunistic Credit Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs IHICX

  • ihicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Federated Emerging Market Debt Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs OSFCX

  • osfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Plus Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs NYSAX

  • nysax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Nysa Fund

Expenses: 4.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo