RHS : Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF

RHS is a Sector Equity Market Consumer Defensive with MODERATE fees.

RHS

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF

FI Score

63 /100

Diversification Rating

9 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Consumer Defensive funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RHS vs EMDCX

  • emdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund-Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs RYJHX

  • ryjhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Japan 2x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs SIMVX

  • simvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

SIM Global Core Managed Volatility Fund Class Z Shares

Expenses: 2.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs FNKCX

  • fnkcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Frank Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs FYAIX

  • fyaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Access Flex High Yield Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs GAAEX

  • gaaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs RBNAX

  • rbnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs RYCMX

  • rycmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs RYWDX

  • rywdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Weakening Dollar 2x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs SCBSX

  • scbsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Seix Short-Term Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs CEXAX

  • cexax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Camelot Excalibur Small Cap Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs RYAEX

  • ryaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Europe Advantage Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs RYEUX

  • ryeux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Europe Advantage Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs SIBPX

  • sibpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs TGCIX

  • tgcix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Timothy Plan Growth & Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs BRUCX

  • brucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Brookfield U.S. Listed Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs LPDIX

  • lpdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2060 Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs LPDAX

  • lpdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2060 Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 2.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs LEQCX

  • leqcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

LoCorr Dynamic Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 3.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare RHS vs PADIX

  • padix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Advisors Income and Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 4.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo