RALS : ProShares RAFI Long/Short

RALS is a Alternatives Market Neutral with LOW fees.

RALS

ProShares RAFI Long/Short

FI Score

27 /100

Diversification Rating

4 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,115 Alternatives Neutral funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RALS vs STSCX

47% FI Score
  • stscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Sterling Capital Stratton Small Cap Value Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs PFIAX

47% FI Score
  • pfiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Low Duration Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs PFGRX

47% FI Score
  • pfgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Pioneer Fundamental Growth Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs EUMV

47% FI Score
  • eumv
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol Europe ETF

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SDVGX

47% FI Score
  • sdvgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sit Dividend Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs FFIU

47% FI Score
  • ffiu
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Fieldstone UVA Unconstrained Medium-Term Fixed Income ETF

Expenses: 0.51% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs URA

47% FI Score
  • ura
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Global X Uranium ETF

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs FSDPX

47% FI Score
  • fsdpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Fidelity® Select Materials Portfolio

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SUIIX

47% FI Score
  • suiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

DWS CROCI International Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SFIG

47% FI Score
  • sfig
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SYG

47% FI Score
  • syg
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

SPDR MFS Systematic Growth Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs HSDAX

47% FI Score
  • hsdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Short Duration Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs MCA

47% FI Score
  • mca
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc.

Expenses: 2.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SCWCX

47% FI Score
  • scwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs HRTVX

47% FI Score
  • hrtvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Heartland Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs LIT

47% FI Score
  • lit
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs ETW

47% FI Score
  • etw
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Options-based

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs GHYB

47% FI Score
  • ghyb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs UTBPX

47% FI Score
  • utbpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

UBS Total Return Bond Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs UEVM

47% FI Score
  • uevm
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

VictoryShares USAA MSCI Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo