RALS : ProShares RAFI Long/Short

RALS is a Alternatives Market Neutral with LOW fees.

RALS

ProShares RAFI Long/Short

FI Score

27 /100

Diversification Rating

4 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,115 Alternatives Neutral funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RALS vs ERH

47% FI Score
  • erh
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs URA

47% FI Score
  • ura
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Global X Uranium ETF

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SEKIX

47% FI Score
  • sekix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs ABDAX

47% FI Score
  • abdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Columbia Capital Allocation Conservative Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs FCMVX

47% FI Score
  • fcmvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Fidelity® Mid Cap Value K6 Fund

Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SDVGX

47% FI Score
  • sdvgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sit Dividend Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs UTBPX

47% FI Score
  • utbpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

UBS Total Return Bond Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs DGLAX

47% FI Score
  • dglax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs GF

47% FI Score
  • gf
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

New Germany Fund Inc.

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs BASIX

47% FI Score
  • basix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Portfolio Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs HRTVX

47% FI Score
  • hrtvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Heartland Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs MXIIX

47% FI Score
  • mxiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Touchstone Flexible Income Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs HSDAX

47% FI Score
  • hsdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Short Duration Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs FEO

47% FI Score
  • feo
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

First Trust/Aberdeen Emerging Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs VGFO

47% FI Score
  • vgfo
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus WMC Global Factor Opportunities ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs POEAX

47% FI Score
  • poeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs ALNYX

47% FI Score
  • alnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund New York Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs LIT

47% FI Score
  • lit
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SCWCX

47% FI Score
  • scwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs STOT

47% FI Score
  • stot
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

SPDR DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo