RALS : ProShares RAFI Long/Short

RALS is a Alternatives Market Neutral with LOW fees.

RALS

ProShares RAFI Long/Short

FI Score

27 /100

Diversification Rating

4 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,115 Alternatives Neutral funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RALS vs ERH

47% FI Score
  • erh
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs GQRIX

47% FI Score
  • gqrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs URTY

47% FI Score
  • urty
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs LUBIX

47% FI Score
  • lubix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Thrivent Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs CPCFX

47% FI Score
  • cpcfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs NEARX

47% FI Score
  • nearx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs ALNYX

47% FI Score
  • alnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund New York Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs FEO

47% FI Score
  • feo
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

First Trust/Aberdeen Emerging Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs AFB

47% FI Score
  • afb
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund

Expenses: 2.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs NBMTX

47% FI Score
  • nbmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Trust Class

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SDVGX

47% FI Score
  • sdvgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sit Dividend Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs NAWGX

47% FI Score
  • nawgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs LIT

47% FI Score
  • lit
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs URA

47% FI Score
  • ura
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Global X Uranium ETF

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs VGFO

47% FI Score
  • vgfo
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus WMC Global Factor Opportunities ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs JAPIX

47% FI Score
  • japix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Janus Henderson Large Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs POEAX

47% FI Score
  • poeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs FEP

47% FI Score
  • fep
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs HSDAX

47% FI Score
  • hsdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Short Duration Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs JRBFX

47% FI Score
  • jrbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

John Hancock Regional Bank Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo