RALS : ProShares RAFI Long/Short

RALS is a Alternatives Market Neutral with LOW fees.

RALS

ProShares RAFI Long/Short

FI Score

27 /100

Diversification Rating

4 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,115 Alternatives Neutral funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare RALS vs ACFOX

47% FI Score
  • acfox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs JCUIX

47% FI Score
  • jcuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Money Market
  • World

John Hancock Funds Absolute Return Currency Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SFIG

47% FI Score
  • sfig
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs LSGSX

47% FI Score
  • lsgsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs LEVOX

47% FI Score
  • levox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Lazard US Equity Concentrated Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs ALGRX

47% FI Score
  • algrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Alger Focus Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs URTY

47% FI Score
  • urty
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs OHYAX

47% FI Score
  • ohyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs AMZA

47% FI Score
  • amza
  • ETF
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

InfraCap MLP ETF

Expenses: 2.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs MIMYX

47% FI Score
  • mimyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs LSFYX

47% FI Score
  • lsfyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs MLDAX

47% FI Score
  • mldax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Short Duration Income Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SCWCX

47% FI Score
  • scwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs JNUG

47% FI Score
  • jnug
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X Shares

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs IHY

47% FI Score
  • ihy
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs OAKGX

47% FI Score
  • oakgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Oakmark Global Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs NEWCX

47% FI Score
  • newcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

American Funds New World Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs AMAGX

47% FI Score
  • amagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund Investor

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs SDVGX

47% FI Score
  • sdvgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sit Dividend Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare RALS vs UTBPX

47% FI Score
  • utbpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

UBS Total Return Bond Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo