NUBAX : Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

NUBAX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

NUBAX

Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

FI Score

11 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NUBAX vs DIEAX

40% FI Score
  • dieax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

BNY Mellon International Core Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs DILAX

40% FI Score
  • dilax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Davis International Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs CVGRX

40% FI Score
  • cvgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Calamos Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs CVMCX

40% FI Score
  • cvmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs MWUIX

40% FI Score
  • mwuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Metropolitan West Ultra Short Bond Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs DSEFX

40% FI Score
  • dsefx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Domini Impact Equity Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PCOTX

40% FI Score
  • pcotx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Pioneer Core Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs EEMD

40% FI Score
  • eemd
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs RRGIX

40% FI Score
  • rrgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs EIFVX

40% FI Score
  • eifvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs RYOFX

40% FI Score
  • ryofx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Royce Opportunity Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs EQIIX

40% FI Score
  • eqiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PGAL

40% FI Score
  • pgal
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

Global X MSCI Portugal ETF

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs EWGS

40% FI Score
  • ewgs
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares MSCI Germany Small-Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PIBAX

40% FI Score
  • pibax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PGIM Balanced Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs EYLD

40% FI Score
  • eyld
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs ACES

40% FI Score
  • aces
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

ALPS Clean Energy ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs GGSCX

40% FI Score
  • ggscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs ACLCX

40% FI Score
  • aclcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

American Century Value Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs LMSIX

40% FI Score
  • lmsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

QS U.S. Small Capitalization Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo