NUBAX : Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

NUBAX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

NUBAX

Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

FI Score

11 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NUBAX vs QMHIX

40% FI Score
  • qmhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs QLS

40% FI Score
  • qls
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Short

IQ Hedge Long/Short Tracker ETF

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs BIRAX

40% FI Score
  • birax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

BlackRock Advantage ESG U.S. Equity Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs BOPAX

40% FI Score
  • bopax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sterling Capital Special Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PWGAX

40% FI Score
  • pwgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

PACE International Equity Investments Class A

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs BWLCX

40% FI Score
  • bwlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Value Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs MCTRX

40% FI Score
  • mctrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MainStay Income Builder Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs MFOCX

40% FI Score
  • mfocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Marsico Focus Fund

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs CCD

40% FI Score
  • ccd
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Other

Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund

Expenses: 3.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Other fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs CEMFX

40% FI Score
  • cemfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs CEN

40% FI Score
  • cen
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

Center Coast Brookfield MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund

Expenses: 3.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs EKWYX

40% FI Score
  • ekwyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Wells Fargo Precious Metals Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs DDIV

40% FI Score
  • ddiv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs CNRG

40% FI Score
  • cnrg
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

SPDR Kensho Clean Power ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs DEMG

40% FI Score
  • demg
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Xtrackers FTSE Emerging Comprehensive Factor ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PZD

40% FI Score
  • pzd
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Invesco Cleantech ETF

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PSKNX

40% FI Score
  • psknx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (Unhedged) Class I-3

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PCRNX

40% FI Score
  • pcrnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class I-3

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs CSMMX

40% FI Score
  • csmmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Invesco Summit Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs QIVCX

40% FI Score
  • qivcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer International Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo