MACSX : Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund Investor Class

MACSX is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with MODERATE fees.

MACSX

Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund Investor Class

FI Score

53 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MACSX vs ECRRX

18% FI Score
  • ecrrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs PFKAX

18% FI Score
  • pfkax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Pacific Funds Small-Cap Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs GURCX

17% FI Score
  • gurcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs SFGCX

17% FI Score
  • sfgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs FGOCX

17% FI Score
  • fgocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Government Income Securities Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs HSIEX

17% FI Score
  • hsiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Hussman Strategic International Fund

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs HYLD

17% FI Score
  • hyld
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

High Yield ETF

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs ICMBX

17% FI Score
  • icmbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Intrepid Capital Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs ICONX

17% FI Score
  • iconx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

ICON Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs ICOPX

17% FI Score
  • icopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs ICTVX

17% FI Score
  • ictvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

ICON Utilities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs IIXAX

17% FI Score
  • iixax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs LPBCX

17% FI Score
  • lpbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2025 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs GARBX

17% FI Score
  • garbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guinness Atkinson Renminbi Yuan & Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs IOCZX

17% FI Score
  • ioczx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ICON Risk-Managed Balanced Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs GLLAX

17% FI Score
  • gllax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs GNDCX

17% FI Score
  • gndcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs UTPIX

17% FI Score
  • utpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs LDPAX

17% FI Score
  • ldpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Leland Thomson Reuters Private Equity Buyout Index Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MACSX vs QMLAX

17% FI Score
  • qmlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Quantified Market Leaders Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo