Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Goldman Sachs Satellite Strategies Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
State Street Defensive Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Virtus SGA Global Growth I Class
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Barclays ETN+ FI Enhanced Global High Yield ETN B
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Horizon Multi-Asset Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
MFS Global Growth Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map