• joelx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

JPMorgan Opportunistic Equity Long/Short Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• asclx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 2.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• emayx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• mnwcx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

MFS Managed Wealth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• abrvx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• plhzx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

PGIM QMA Long-Short Equity Fund-Class Z

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• eaaax
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund Class AAA

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• nlscx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• qls
• ETF
• Alternatives
• Short

IQ Hedge Long/Short Tracker ETF

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• btpix
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Salient Tactical Plus Fund Class F

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »