• ftgox
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Salient Tactical Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• fquax
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

AMG FQ Long-Short Equity Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• agaqx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

361 Global Long/Short Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• snoix
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• spedx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Alger Dynamic Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• htus
• ETF
• Alternatives
• Short

Hull Tactical US ETF

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• rlsfx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 2.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• plhax
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

PGIM QMA Long-Short Equity Fund-Class A

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• abrtx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• emaax
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »