Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
10 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class Investor
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class Investor II
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Putnam Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Hartford Global Impact Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Baron Global Advantage Fund Retail Shares
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Templeton Growth Fund, Inc. Class C
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
American Century Focused Global Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map