FLAX : Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF

FLAX is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with LOW fees.

FLAX

Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF

FI Score

59 /100

Diversification Rating

6 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FLAX vs DVLU

32% FI Score
  • dvlu
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs DVFAX

32% FI Score
  • dvfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Cohen & Steers Alternative Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs DUMSX

32% FI Score
  • dumsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Dupree Mutual Fund Mississippi Tax-Free Income Fund

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs RSPFX

32% FI Score
  • rspfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Victory RS Partners Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs RULFX

32% FI Score
  • rulfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

RBC Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs DLREX

32% FI Score
  • dlrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

DoubleLine Colony Real Estate and Income Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs GILIX

32% FI Score
  • gilix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund Institutional

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs DLCEX

32% FI Score
  • dlcex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Dana Large Cap Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs DHSMX

32% FI Score
  • dhsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs DHTAX

32% FI Score
  • dhtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Diamond Hill All Cap Select Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs DHPAX

32% FI Score
  • dhpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Diamond Hill Mid Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs MWFRX

32% FI Score
  • mwfrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Floating Rate Income Fund Class M

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs RSMOX

32% FI Score
  • rsmox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs EXBAX

32% FI Score
  • exbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series Class S

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs PHICX

32% FI Score
  • phicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PGIM Muni High Income Fund-Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs STMDX

32% FI Score
  • stmdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs PLCNX

32% FI Score
  • plcnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Pacific Funds Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs PFGAX

32% FI Score
  • pfgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

PIMCO Long-Term U.S. Government Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs EGRCX

32% FI Score
  • egrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FLAX vs DFVS

32% FI Score
  • dfvs
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

iPath US Treasury 5-year Bear ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo