EVGBC : Eaton Vance Global Income Builder NextShares

EVGBC is a Allocation Market Total World with MODERATE fees.

EVGBC

Eaton Vance Global Income Builder NextShares

FI Score

33 /100

Diversification Rating

5 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare EVGBC vs STSEX

43% FI Score
  • stsex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

BlackRock Exchange Portfolio BlackRock Shares

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs TGUSX

43% FI Score
  • tgusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

TCW New America Premier Equities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs THNIX

43% FI Score
  • thnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Thornburg New Mexico Intermediate Municipal Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs TMMAX

43% FI Score
  • tmmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Volatility Fund Class F

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs WAMCX

43% FI Score
  • wamcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs WFHY

43% FI Score
  • wfhy
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs WINAX

43% FI Score
  • winax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Wilmington International Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs BTTRX

43% FI Score
  • bttrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

American Century Zero Coupon 2025 Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs JFIFX

43% FI Score
  • jfifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

John Hancock Financial Industries Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs JIICX

43% FI Score
  • jiicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

JPMorgan International Advantage Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs ABQUX

43% FI Score
  • abqux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

AB Total Return Bond Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs BSBE

43% FI Score
  • bsbe
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco BulletShares (R) 2022 USD Emerging Markets Debt ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs BSDE

43% FI Score
  • bsde
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco BulletShares (R) 2024 Emerging Markets Debt ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs DFEN

43% FI Score
  • dfen
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares Direxion Daily Aerospace

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs MSAQX

43% FI Score
  • msaqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs CRIMX

43% FI Score
  • crimx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

CRM Mid Cap Value Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs CSECX

43% FI Score
  • csecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Calvert Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs CSF

43% FI Score
  • csf
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

VictoryShares US Discovery Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs CSFAX

43% FI Score
  • csfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EVGBC vs DHEAX

43% FI Score
  • dheax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Diamond Hill Short Duration Total Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo