Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$CLACX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- arthx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Artisan Global Equity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aglcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Century Focused Global Growth Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ssgmx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
State Street Defensive Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tmuix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Transamerica Global Equity Class I
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- csrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Columbia Global Dividend Opportunity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aglox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Ariel Global Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dvfax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Cohen & Steers Alternative Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sgifx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ekgyx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Global Small Cap Fund Class Admin
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mwocx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Global Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pqizx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gxscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Goldman Sachs Satellite Strategies Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fgilx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Fidelity® Global Equity Income Fund
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mwobx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Global Growth Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gicpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class AAA
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rgcex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Columbia Select Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gggax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lpeix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gmcix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
LMCG Global MultiCap Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »