CHIC : Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

CHIC is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIC vs HBLRX

48% FI Score
  • hblrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

The Hartford Balanced Income Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FFRSX

48% FI Score
  • ffrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Federated Floating Rate Strategic Income Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs HFATX

48% FI Score
  • hfatx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FIDSX

48% FI Score
  • fidsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Fidelity® Select Financial Services Portfolio

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs HIPIX

48% FI Score
  • hipix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Hartford Inflation Plus Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs HIPTX

48% FI Score
  • hiptx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Hartford Inflation Plus Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs HISVX

48% FI Score
  • hisvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Harbor Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs HLMGX

48% FI Score
  • hlmgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FLRSX

48% FI Score
  • flrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2030 Retirement Target Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs HQBTX

48% FI Score
  • hqbtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FNARX

48% FI Score
  • fnarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Fidelity® Select Natural Resources Portfolio

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FNYIX

48% FI Score
  • fnyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Franklin New York Tax Free Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SPDV

48% FI Score
  • spdv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FSGVX

48% FI Score
  • fsgvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated U.S. Government Securities Fund 1-3 Years Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs TMCTX

48% FI Score
  • tmctx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Touchstone Mid Cap Fund Class Z

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs TMAPX

48% FI Score
  • tmapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Touchstone Mid Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs INDZX

48% FI Score
  • indzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Columbia Large Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs GBLCX

48% FI Score
  • gblcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ISIAX

48% FI Score
  • isiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Voya Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs IUSS

48% FI Score
  • iuss
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Invesco RAFI Strategic US Small Company ETF

Expenses: 0.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo