CHIC : Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

CHIC is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIC vs JBLBX

48% FI Score
  • jblbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class B

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs JCLBX

48% FI Score
  • jclbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs JDGTX

48% FI Score
  • jdgtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Global Income Managed Volatility Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs JHMS

48% FI Score
  • jhms
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

John Hancock Multifactor Consumer Staples ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs JMUTX

48% FI Score
  • jmutx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Janus Henderson Multi-Sector Income Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs VAFCX

48% FI Score
  • vafcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Invesco American Franchise Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs VRIG

48% FI Score
  • vrig
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Short

Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs LCGRX

48% FI Score
  • lcgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs LEISX

48% FI Score
  • leisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Federated Equity Income Fund, Inc. Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs LGRCX

48% FI Score
  • lgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs WFEIX

48% FI Score
  • wfeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Wells Fargo Enterprise Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MMHBX

48% FI Score
  • mmhbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal High Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MTZIX

48% FI Score
  • mtzix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2055 Series Class I

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MTMAX

48% FI Score
  • mtmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MainStay MacKay Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NETL

48% FI Score
  • netl
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NVHCX

48% FI Score
  • nvhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C2

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs OARLX

48% FI Score
  • oarlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Oakmark Select Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NWFAX

48% FI Score
  • nwfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs OCIO

48% FI Score
  • ocio
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ClearShares OCIO ETF

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PAREX

48% FI Score
  • parex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

T. Rowe Price Real Estate Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo