CHIC : Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

CHIC is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIC vs PCYBX

48% FI Score
  • pcybx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Pioneer Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PDVAX

48% FI Score
  • pdvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PIMCO Diversified Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs AHIIX

48% FI Score
  • ahiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century High Income Fund I Class

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PGOAX

48% FI Score
  • pgoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

PGIM Jennison Small Company Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ANBAX

48% FI Score
  • anbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Funds Strategic Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ANBEX

48% FI Score
  • anbex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Funds Strategic Bond Fund Class F-1

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ANONX

48% FI Score
  • anonx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

American Century Small Cap Growth Fund I Class

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs AOOIX

48% FI Score
  • aooix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2045 Portfolio I Class

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ARTGX

48% FI Score
  • artgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Artisan Global Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PSVDX

48% FI Score
  • psvdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

PGIM QMA Small-Cap Value Fund- Class R2

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ARTMX

48% FI Score
  • artmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Artisan Mid Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NSTAX

48% FI Score
  • nstax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NUGT

48% FI Score
  • nugt
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X Shares

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NUMV

48% FI Score
  • numv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs TDIV

48% FI Score
  • tdiv
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs OAKWX

48% FI Score
  • oakwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Oakmark Global Select Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs AWF

48% FI Score
  • awf
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund Inc.

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs BAGAX

48% FI Score
  • bagax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund Advisor Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs BAEIX

48% FI Score
  • baeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs BASFX

48% FI Score
  • basfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BMO Short Tax-Free Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo