CHIC : Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

CHIC is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIC vs MACBX

48% FI Score
  • macbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Conservative Allocation Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PRMAX

48% FI Score
  • prmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Class A

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs BOPIX

48% FI Score
  • bopix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sterling Capital Special Opportunities Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs BSCFX

48% FI Score
  • bscfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Baron Small Cap Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MFRBX

48% FI Score
  • mfrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Research Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MIGBX

48% FI Score
  • migbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FYC

48% FI Score
  • fyc
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ACSYX

48% FI Score
  • acsyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Invesco Comstock Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs BIAUX

48% FI Score
  • biaux
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs HSCYX

48% FI Score
  • hscyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

The Hartford Small Company Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs CPOAX

48% FI Score
  • cpoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Morgan Stanley Insight Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs GVIP

48% FI Score
  • gvip
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FFR

48% FI Score
  • ffr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

First Trust FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Markets Real Estate Index Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FHARX

48% FI Score
  • fharx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2040 Fund

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs HFMRX

48% FI Score
  • hfmrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

The Hartford MidCap Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FIMSX

48% FI Score
  • fimsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Fidelity® Municipal Income 2025 Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs HMVYX

48% FI Score
  • hmvyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs GDNA

48% FI Score
  • gdna
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Goldman Sachs Human Evolution ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs EQRR

48% FI Score
  • eqrr
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs COIAX

48% FI Score
  • coiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Conservative Income Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo