CHIC : Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

CHIC is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIC vs OPCAX

48% FI Score
  • opcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester California Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs OSGIX

48% FI Score
  • osgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs DWAS

48% FI Score
  • dwas
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PARPX

48% FI Score
  • parpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Short Duration Bond Fund Class B

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PLADX

48% FI Score
  • pladx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pacific Funds Short Duration Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs RYTRX

48% FI Score
  • rytrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Royce Total Return Fund Investment Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs EITTX

48% FI Score
  • eittx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Parametric TABS 10-to-20 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PDCZX

48% FI Score
  • pdczx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PGIM Income Builder Fund-Class Z

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PEEAX

48% FI Score
  • peeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PEQNX

48% FI Score
  • peqnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Putnam Equity Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PEQCX

48% FI Score
  • peqcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Putnam Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs EOS

48% FI Score
  • eos
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Options-based

Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs SENCX

48% FI Score
  • sencx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Touchstone Large Cap Focused Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ESGF

48% FI Score
  • esgf
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global ESG Revenue ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ESGW

48% FI Score
  • esgw
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Sustainable Global Equity Income ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs HGXVX

48% FI Score
  • hgxvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Impact Fund Class R6

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs GRNB

48% FI Score
  • grnb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FCAL

48% FI Score
  • fcal
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs FCITX

48% FI Score
  • fcitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Franklin Federal Intermediate-Term Tax-Free Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs TNEAX

48% FI Score
  • tneax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo