BATT : Amplify Advanced Battery Metals and Materials ETF

BATT is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

BATT

Amplify Advanced Battery Metals and Materials ETF

FI Score

22 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare BATT vs CWGCX

49% FI Score
  • cwgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs SZMAX

49% FI Score
  • szmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

DWS Intermediate Tax-Free Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs SPXV

49% FI Score
  • spxv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

ProShares S&P 500 ex-Health Care ETF

Expenses: 0.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs HMKIX

49% FI Score
  • hmkix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Hartford Municipal Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs HLEMX

49% FI Score
  • hlemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Portfolio Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs CUSOX

49% FI Score
  • cusox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs GCIAX

49% FI Score
  • gciax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs JO

49% FI Score
  • jo
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

iPath Series B Bloomberg Coffee Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs VRGAX

49% FI Score
  • vrgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2040 Fund Class AX

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs CVMAX

49% FI Score
  • cvmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs CAMIX

49% FI Score
  • camix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Cambiar International Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs FHQRX

49% FI Score
  • fhqrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Franklin High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs OGINX

49% FI Score
  • oginx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs IVFIX

49% FI Score
  • ivfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Federated International Strategic Value Dividend Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs EEMS

49% FI Score
  • eems
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs FHISX

49% FI Score
  • fhisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Federated High Income Bond Fund Class IS Shares

Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs USEQ

49% FI Score
  • useq
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Invesco Russell 1000 Enhanced Equal Weight ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs UBG

49% FI Score
  • ubg
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

UBS ETRACS CMCI Gold Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs NPFCX

49% FI Score
  • npfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Funds New Perspective Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs YAFIX

49% FI Score
  • yafix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

AMG Yacktman Focused Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo