BATT : Amplify Advanced Battery Metals and Materials ETF

BATT is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

BATT

Amplify Advanced Battery Metals and Materials ETF

FI Score

22 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare BATT vs HFYSX

49% FI Score
  • hfysx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs DBEZ

49% FI Score
  • dbez
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs BBNTX

49% FI Score
  • bbntx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs BBLIX

49% FI Score
  • bblix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs ACCNX

49% FI Score
  • accnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Century Core Plus Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs SPXV

49% FI Score
  • spxv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

ProShares S&P 500 ex-Health Care ETF

Expenses: 0.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs MMIGX

49% FI Score
  • mmigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal Income Fund Class B1

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs CVSCX

49% FI Score
  • cvscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs MMACX

49% FI Score
  • mmacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Moderate Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs MMABX

49% FI Score
  • mmabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Moderate Allocation Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs FNGU

49% FI Score
  • fngu
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs ITHRX

49% FI Score
  • ithrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

The Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs FSEAX

49% FI Score
  • fseax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Fidelity® Emerging Asia Fund

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs BBSGX

49% FI Score
  • bbsgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs DBC

49% FI Score
  • dbc
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs BSCT

49% FI Score
  • bsct
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs OIDCX

49% FI Score
  • oidcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer International Diversified Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs OMECX

49% FI Score
  • omecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

JPMorgan Market Expansion Enhanced Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs ISEM

49% FI Score
  • isem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco RAFI Strategic Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BATT vs TOBYX

49% FI Score
  • tobyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Touchstone Active Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo