All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- rbbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Columbia Income Builder Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- dscvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
BNY Mellon Opportunistic Small Cap Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ppuax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (Unhedged) Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- leifx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Federated Equity Income Fund, Inc. Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ghayx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Basic Materials
VanEck Global Hard Assets Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- nbqax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Nuveen International Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- tvoyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Touchstone Small Cap Value Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- aglox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Ariel Global Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- arfmx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio A Class
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »