All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- lidax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Lord Abbett International Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- pjgzx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- qdyn
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
FlexShares Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund
Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- wfvdx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Wells Fargo International Value Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- adecx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Columbia Large Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- domax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Domini Impact International Equity Fund A Shares
Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- domix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Domini Impact International Equity Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- eplpx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
MainStay Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- erm
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
EquityCompass Risk Manager ETF
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »