• msulx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

• atmcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

PIMCO Strategic Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• atpcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Aquila Three Peaks High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• atvix
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Value

Athena Behavioral Tactical Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• ccdvx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Calamos Dividend Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• dabax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Delaware Global Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• dag
• ETF
• Commodities
• Focused

DB Agriculture Double Long ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

• dgbp
• ETF
• Money Market
• World

Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long USD vs. GBP Index

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

• trfax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Patriot Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• qagix
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Growth

Quaker Impact Growth Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• rylvx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Value

Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• eixax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• pcyix
• Mutual Fund
• Commodities
• Broad

PCS Commodity Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

• ryhix
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Healthcare

Rydex Health Care Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

• emdax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund-Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• pfvcx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Value

Pacific Funds Large-Cap Value Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• pglox
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Consumer Defensive

T. Rowe Price Global Consumer Fund

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

• oipix
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Catalyst Enhanced Core Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• smipx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Blend

Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• uhpix
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort China Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »