Diversification Rating
8 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
9 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$VIOO Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- vpl
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Asia/Pacific Stock
Vanguard FTSE Pacific Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- wmbix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Wells Fargo Municipal Bond Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jimix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
JPMorgan Short-Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- feny
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Energy
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
Expenses: 0.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »
- vihax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Fund Admiral Shares
Expenses: 0.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- mamax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MFS Moderate Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fndf
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- scz
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- inpax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- itm
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
VanEck Vectors AMT-Free Intermediate Municipal Index ETF
Expenses: 0.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pggfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Funds Global Growth Portfolio Class F-1
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dbirx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
BNY Mellon Bond Market Index Fund - Class I
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- vcorx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Vanguard Core Bond Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- vwehx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vwesx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Vanguard Long-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mbfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- onifx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
JPMorgan Investor Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ongfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
JPMorgan Investor Growth & Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »