UUPSX : ProFunds UltraEmerging Markets Fund Service Class

UUPSX is a Alternative Market Leveraged Equities with HIGH fees.

UUPSX

ProFunds UltraEmerging Markets Fund Service Class

FI Score

6 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,170 Alternative Leveraged Equities funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare UUPSX vs ARTGX

48% FI Score
  • artgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Artisan Global Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs PXI

48% FI Score
  • pxi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs JBLBX

48% FI Score
  • jblbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class B

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs MIGDX

48% FI Score
  • migdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs OCIO

48% FI Score
  • ocio
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ClearShares OCIO ETF

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs LSDRX

48% FI Score
  • lsdrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund A Class

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs FCAL

48% FI Score
  • fcal
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs JCLBX

48% FI Score
  • jclbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs VFQY

48% FI Score
  • vfqy
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF ETF Shares

Expenses: 0.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs NWFAX

48% FI Score
  • nwfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs AIZAX

48% FI Score
  • aizax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

AB International Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs FCITX

48% FI Score
  • fcitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Franklin Federal Intermediate-Term Tax-Free Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs OARLX

48% FI Score
  • oarlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Oakmark Select Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs RCD

48% FI Score
  • rcd
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs POBAX

48% FI Score
  • pobax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs TWMIX

48% FI Score
  • twmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

American Century Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs ANBAX

48% FI Score
  • anbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Funds Strategic Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs TNEAX

48% FI Score
  • tneax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs TDIV

48% FI Score
  • tdiv
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs NVHCX

48% FI Score
  • nvhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C2

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo