UUPSX : ProFunds UltraEmerging Markets Fund Service Class

UUPSX is a Alternative Market Leveraged Equities with HIGH fees.

UUPSX

ProFunds UltraEmerging Markets Fund Service Class

FI Score

6 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,170 Alternative Leveraged Equities funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare UUPSX vs USNYX

48% FI Score
  • usnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA New York Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs OAKWX

48% FI Score
  • oakwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Oakmark Global Select Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs JCLBX

48% FI Score
  • jclbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs HISVX

48% FI Score
  • hisvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Harbor Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs FIMSX

48% FI Score
  • fimsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Fidelity® Municipal Income 2025 Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs LGRCX

48% FI Score
  • lgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs JBLBX

48% FI Score
  • jblbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class B

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs MTMAX

48% FI Score
  • mtmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MainStay MacKay Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs HIPIX

48% FI Score
  • hipix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Hartford Inflation Plus Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs MTZIX

48% FI Score
  • mtzix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2055 Series Class I

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs ASVIX

48% FI Score
  • asvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

American Century Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs EEMO

48% FI Score
  • eemo
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs PRISX

48% FI Score
  • prisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs JPEM

48% FI Score
  • jpem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

JPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs FCAL

48% FI Score
  • fcal
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs HIPTX

48% FI Score
  • hiptx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Hartford Inflation Plus Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs RVRS

48% FI Score
  • rvrs
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Reverse Cap Weighted U.S. Large Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs MMHBX

48% FI Score
  • mmhbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal High Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs BASFX

48% FI Score
  • basfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BMO Short Tax-Free Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs MINDX

48% FI Score
  • mindx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • India Stock

Matthews India Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo