TRVLX : T. Rowe Price Value Fund

TRVLX is a US Stocks Market Large Value with MODERATE fees.

TRVLX

T. Rowe Price Value Fund

FI Score

68 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare TRVLX vs PGHYX

23% FI Score
  • pghyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Global High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs GGEAX

23% FI Score
  • ggeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nationwide Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs LPCNX

23% FI Score
  • lpcnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2030 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs TGNIX

23% FI Score
  • tgnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

TCW Funds, Inc. - TCW International Small Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs MIECX

23% FI Score
  • miecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

MainStay MacKay International Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs JRSVX

23% FI Score
  • jrsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

James Alpha Relative Value Portfolio Class S Shares

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs AADR

23% FI Score
  • aadr
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs MCNYX

23% FI Score
  • mcnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS New York Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs LPCKX

23% FI Score
  • lpckx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2040 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs LPBIX

23% FI Score
  • lpbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2025 Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs RYHJX

23% FI Score
  • ryhjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse Government Long Bond Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 4.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs BGLCX

23% FI Score
  • bglcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs MDGRX

22% FI Score
  • mdgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs BEECX

22% FI Score
  • beecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

BlackRock Total Emerging Markets Fund Investor C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs JOLIX

22% FI Score
  • jolix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Managed Volatility Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs HQBCX

22% FI Score
  • hqbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs AVACX

22% FI Score
  • avacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs KSMUX

22% FI Score
  • ksmux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Kansas Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs JIEIX

22% FI Score
  • jieix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Aberdeen Select International Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 2.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TRVLX vs KARS

22% FI Score
  • kars
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo