Diversification Rating
6 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$TRTY Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- lgi
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund Inc
Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pxeax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Pax Global Environmental Markets Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bfit
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Global X Health & Wellness Thematic ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sgidx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tincx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Templeton Global Balanced Fund Class A1
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hglb
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Highland Global Allocation Fund
Expenses: 2.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tedsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hgxix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Impact Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bsglx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »