Diversification Rating
8 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$TOK Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mevox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Managed Equity Volatility Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- psp
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lpefx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- vicax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bgvix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Brandes Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- adavx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aberdeen Dynamic Dividend Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- piptx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gdmox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dprex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Delaware Global Listed Real Assets Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »