TAN : Invesco Solar ETF

TAN is a Allocation Market Other with HIGH fees.

TAN

Invesco Solar ETF

FI Score

39 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,674 Allocation Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare TAN vs WLCVX

32% FI Score
  • wlcvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Wilshire Large Company Value Portfolio Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs FDBCX

32% FI Score
  • fdbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Federated Bond Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs HIMVX

32% FI Score
  • himvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs PFGAX

32% FI Score
  • pfgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

PIMCO Long-Term U.S. Government Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RRGAX

32% FI Score
  • rrgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs PBQFX

32% FI Score
  • pbqfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

PGIM Jennison Blend Fund- Class B

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs ROGSX

32% FI Score
  • rogsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Red Oak Technology Select Fund

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs PHLCX

32% FI Score
  • phlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs TDVFX

32% FI Score
  • tdvfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Towle Deep Value Fund

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RETL

32% FI Score
  • retl
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs TGDVX

32% FI Score
  • tgdvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

TCW Relative Value Large Cap Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs LEIBX

32% FI Score
  • leibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Federated Equity Income Fund, Inc. Class B Shares

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs CPUAX

32% FI Score
  • cpuax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AAM/Insight Select Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs STICX

32% FI Score
  • sticx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Seix Corporate Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs DFLAX

32% FI Score
  • dflax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs ICMPX

32% FI Score
  • icmpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs WIBAX

32% FI Score
  • wibax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Wilmington Intermediate-Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs PWBAX

32% FI Score
  • pwbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Virtus Rampart Sector Trend Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs CIGRX

32% FI Score
  • cigrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Calamos International Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs PSRZX

32% FI Score
  • psrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo