TAN : Invesco Solar ETF

TAN is a Allocation Market Other with HIGH fees.

TAN

Invesco Solar ETF

FI Score

39 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,674 Allocation Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare TAN vs CIGRX

32% FI Score
  • cigrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Calamos International Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs PSRZX

32% FI Score
  • psrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs TPAY

32% FI Score
  • tpay
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Tortoise Digital Payments Infrastructure Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs WIBAX

32% FI Score
  • wibax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Wilmington Intermediate-Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RDCCX

32% FI Score
  • rdccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Columbia Disciplined Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs SHYOX

32% FI Score
  • shyox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Western Asset Global High Yield Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs CHII

32% FI Score
  • chii
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Industrials ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs NSCAX

32% FI Score
  • nscax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Nuveen NWQ Small-Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs TDVFX

32% FI Score
  • tdvfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Towle Deep Value Fund

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RYCOX

32% FI Score
  • rycox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Rydex NASDAQ-100® Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs FTNYX

32% FI Score
  • ftnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Delaware Tax-Free New York Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs MGOAX

32% FI Score
  • mgoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs MKIEX

32% FI Score
  • mkiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

McKee International Equity Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs RWCIX

32% FI Score
  • rwcix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

RWC Global Emerging Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs FNGZ

32% FI Score
  • fngz
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

MicroSectors FANG+ Index -2X Inverse Leveraged ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs BUG

32% FI Score
  • bug
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Global X Cybersecurity ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs BUFMX

32% FI Score
  • bufmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Buffalo Mid Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs BUFDX

32% FI Score
  • bufdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs VFFCX

32% FI Score
  • vffcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Victory INCORE Fund for Income Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TAN vs NMGCX

32% FI Score
  • nmgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo