SUHCX : DWS Health and Wellness Fund - Class C

SUHCX is a Sector Equity Market Healthcare with HIGH fees.

SUHCX

DWS Health and Wellness Fund - Class C

FI Score

16 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Healthcare funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SUHCX vs OSTGX

31% FI Score
  • ostgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Osterweis Emerging Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs AGQ

31% FI Score
  • agq
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

ProShares Ultra Silver

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs PELNX

31% FI Score
  • pelnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class I-3

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs ADJEX

31% FI Score
  • adjex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Azzad Ethical Fund

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs AMPAX

31% FI Score
  • ampax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

American Beacon Mid-Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs GCCEX

30% FI Score
  • gccex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Gabelli Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs TRECX

30% FI Score
  • trecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs GFRCX

30% FI Score
  • gfrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs GLL

30% FI Score
  • gll
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Gold

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs JOPPX

30% FI Score
  • joppx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Johnson Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs KGDAX

30% FI Score
  • kgdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

DWS Global Small Cap Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs LCOIX

30% FI Score
  • lcoix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

ClearBridge International Small Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs LDSF

30% FI Score
  • ldsf
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs LMCLX

30% FI Score
  • lmclx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Miller Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs QMNIX

30% FI Score
  • qmnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I

Expenses: 2.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs RALIX

30% FI Score
  • ralix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Real Assets and Pricing Opportunities Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs TSSAX

30% FI Score
  • tssax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Thornburg Strategic Municipal Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs NILTX

30% FI Score
  • niltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Neuberger Berman International Select Fund Class Trust

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs PWTAX

30% FI Score
  • pwtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

UBS U.S. Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SUHCX vs MUHLX

30% FI Score
  • muhlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Muhlenkamp Fund

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo