SIL : Global X Silver Miners ETF

SIL is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

SIL

Global X Silver Miners ETF

FI Score

62 /100

Diversification Rating

10 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SIL vs WRLDX

42% FI Score
  • wrldx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Scharf Global Opportunity Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs ESEAX

42% FI Score
  • eseax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Select Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs MTDKX

42% FI Score
  • mtdkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target Income Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs SILVX

42% FI Score
  • silvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

SGI U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs SKSIX

42% FI Score
  • sksix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

AMG Managers Skyline Special Equities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs OIBAX

42% FI Score
  • oibax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer International Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs OMGCX

42% FI Score
  • omgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs OOSAX

42% FI Score
  • oosax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs JBOIX

42% FI Score
  • jboix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

John Hancock ESG Core Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs IUTCX

42% FI Score
  • iutcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Invesco Dividend Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs MWEBX

42% FI Score
  • mwebx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs EUO

42% FI Score
  • euo
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Euro

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs GLV

42% FI Score
  • glv
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Tactical Allocation

Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund

Expenses: 3.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Tactical Allocation Other fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs TEQAX

42% FI Score
  • teqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs PIFCX

42% FI Score
  • pifcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs PMYBX

42% FI Score
  • pmybx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs PMYCX

42% FI Score
  • pmycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs HABCX

42% FI Score
  • habcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

The Hartford Total Return Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs TLCYX

42% FI Score
  • tlcyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Touchstone Large Cap Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SIL vs TMCJX

42% FI Score
  • tmcjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Touchstone Mid Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo